Candace Owens takes a definitive stance, asserting that Lia Thomas should be banned from women’s sports

In recent years, the inclusion of transgender athletes in sports has sparked intense debate globally. At the forefront of this conversation is Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer who competed in women’s collegiate events, dominating some competitions and breaking records. The case has reignited discussions about fairness, biological advantages, and the integrity of women’s sports. Prominent conservative commentator Candace Owens has weighed in on the matter, making her position unequivocally clear: Lia Thomas should be banned from competing in women’s sports. Owens’ remarks reflect a growing discourse about the intersection of gender identity and athletic competition.

Owens, known for her unapologetic opinions on social and cultural issues, argues that allowing transgender women who have undergone male puberty to compete in women’s sports creates an inherent imbalance. She contends that despite hormone treatments or surgeries, biological males retain physical advantages such as larger lung capacity, denser muscle mass, and greater bone density. These attributes, Owens asserts, provide transgender athletes like Lia Thomas with a competitive edge that cannot be entirely mitigated through transition-related medical interventions.

Speaking on her podcast, Owens stated, “Women have fought for decades for equality and recognition in sports. Allowing biological males to compete against women undermines those efforts and disrespects the essence of fair competition.” Her comments resonate with many who believe that biological differences between males and females create a disparity that can’t be reconciled in athletic settings.

Owens’ stance is supported by a significant segment of the population, including athletes, coaches, and parents who fear that the inclusion of transgender athletes could discourage young women from participating in sports. Critics argue that young girls could face reduced opportunities for scholarships, awards, and recognition in a system they believe is skewed against them.

However, Owens’ perspective is not without controversy. Advocates for transgender inclusion argue that such positions marginalize an already vulnerable community. They emphasize that transgender athletes face unique challenges, including stigma, mental health struggles, and societal rejection. For these advocates, participation in sports is not just about competition but also about fostering inclusion, belonging, and equity.

Lia Thomas, for her part, has defended her right to compete, citing her adherence to NCAA rules and compliance with hormone therapy requirements. Thomas has become a symbol of the broader debate, with her presence in women’s sports serving as a litmus test for how societies navigate issues of gender and fairness.

Owens’ call to ban transgender athletes like Lia Thomas from women’s sports echoes broader political and cultural divides. While some see her stance as a necessary defense of fairness, others view it as an exclusionary policy that disregards the complexities of gender identity. The debate continues to polarize opinions, with no clear consensus in sight.