NEWS
The only reason Democrats have changed their minds on Tesla is because Elon Musk changed his mind on Donald Trump.” White House press secretary @karolineleavitt weighs in on the Left’s revolt against Trump’s chief cost-cutter, Elon Musk.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt recently addressed the Democratic Party’s evolving stance on Elon Musk, attributing their shift to Musk’s change in position regarding former President Donald Trump. Leavitt’s comments highlight the intersection of corporate leadership, political affiliations, and policy influence within the current U.S. administration.
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, has played a pivotal role in President Trump’s administration as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). In this capacity, Musk has implemented significant cost-cutting measures, including substantial reductions in the federal workforce and budget allocations. These actions have elicited both support and criticism, reflecting a complex relationship between Musk’s business interests and governmental functions.
Initially, Musk’s involvement with the Trump administration was met with skepticism, given his previous criticisms of Trump and support for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election. However, over time, Musk’s alignment with Trump’s policies, particularly those advocating for deregulation and fiscal conservatism, has solidified. This alignment has influenced Democratic perspectives, leading to a reevaluation of Musk’s role and impact.
Democratic reactions to Trump’s address to Congress further underscore this evolving dynamic. During the speech, several Democratic members engaged in protests, including walking out and displaying signs critical of Musk’s influence and the administration’s policies. In response, Press Secretary Leavitt condemned these actions, labeling them as the “most shameful moment in the history of presidential addresses.” She criticized Democrats for their disruptions and for prioritizing partisan dissent over national interests. citeturn0news21
This interplay between Musk’s corporate decisions and political affiliations exemplifies the intricate relationships that define contemporary American politics. As Musk continues to wield significant influence through his role in DOGE, both Democratic and Republican entities are navigating the implications of his actions on policy and governance. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing debates about the appropriate balance between private sector innovation and